For PGCE trainees and ECTs in England

The portfolio writes itself as you teach

Your plans, your reflections and your evidence against the Teachers' Standards, in one place — because someone is going to assess you on it.

25 free generations to start. No card.

Coverage that tracks itself

Link plans to your scheme of work once; every objective's status — planned, delivered, evidenced — derives from what you actually taught. No spreadsheet.

4.2.1Rates of reaction — collision theory
Evidenced
4.2.2Effect of concentration on rate
Delivered
4.2.3Catalysts and activation energy
Planned
4.2.4Required practical: rates
Planned
4.3.1Reversible reactions
Not started

The same record grounds generation: worksheets, homework and cover lessons inherit the plan's tags and its place in your curriculum.

A product that notices things

Praxis reads your own record and says what no generic tool can:

evidence gap

No evidence against S5 (adapt teaching) for 8 weeks. Three recent lessons involved differentiation — tag one of them?

Computed from your own reflections and plans — not generic advice.

Every method tag carries its research, visibly:

Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of Instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19.

Rosenshine, cognitive load theory, retrieval practice and the EEF Toolkit are seeded with real citations — and your tags inherit them.

Generators forget. Praxis remembers.

Worksheets, differentiated versions, homework and cover lessons are generated from the plan you already made — inheriting its research tags and its place in your curriculum — not conjured from a blank prompt.

Assessed against a different framework?